Feedback Report

Stakeholder’ Feedback & Student Satisfaction Survey – 2024-2025

Objective of the survey:

Objectives of Student satisfaction survey and stakeholders’ feedback collection is as follows –

  1. To assess the relevance of the curriculum and the syllabus in respect to current clinical practices.
  2. To identify the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical skill demands.
  3. To measure the usefulness of the educational resources provided for the students.
  4. To understand the perception of alumni about the placement services of the institution.
  5. To determine student readiness for the employment market.
  6. To identify the effectiveness of the teaching methods adopted in the institution.
  7. To identify the scope of curricular evaluation and further modifications to make it more efficient.

Methodology:

At International Institute of Nursing and Research (IINR) stakeholder’s feedback is collected analyzed every year. This feedback is taken regarding syllabus and curriculum. The feedback collection is performed through a structured mechanism, framing questionnaire with a satisfaction scale. The feedback reports are prepared using satisfaction scale of the feedback responses. Feedbacks are collected from five major stakeholders of the institution that are –

  1. Students
  2. Teachers
  3. Alumni
  4. Employers
  5. Professionals

All the stakeholders were given specified feedback forms to fill their responses. They were informed about the importance of this survey and requested for their contribution by providing opinions.

Responses:

Total responses from all stakeholders:

SL
Stakeholder
Number of responses
1
Students
• B. Sc. Nursing 2nd year
• B. Sc. Nursing 3rd year
• B. Sc. Nursing 4th year (7th Sem)
• B. Sc. Nursing 4th year (8th Sem)
• M. Sc. Nursing 2nd year (2024 admission)
• M. Sc. Nursing 2nd year (2023 admission)
• PBB. Sc. Nursing 2nd year (2024 admission)
• PBB. Sc. Nursing 2nd year (2023 admission)
78
61
85
83
19
9
50
48
2
Teachers
100
3
Alumni
56
4
Employers
7
5
Professionals
5
A. Batchwise Student Feedback:

B.Sc. Nursing 2nd year

Topics
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Overall content of syllabus
51
21
6
0
0
Relevance of Curriculum
52
26
0
0
0
Subject distribution in curriculum
46
27
5
0
0
Teaching Methods
61
15
2
0
0
Learning resources
60
17
1
0
0

B.Sc. Nursing 3rd year

Topics
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Overall content of syllabus
44
16
1
0
0
Relevance of Curriculum
50
11
0
0
0
Subject distribution in curriculum
39
20
2
0
0
Teaching Methods
48
12
1
0
0
Learning resources
51
10
0
0
0

B.Sc. Nursing 4th year (7th Sem)

Topics
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Overall content of syllabus
57
25
3
0
0
Relevance of Curriculum
70
15
0
0
0
Subject distribution in curriculum
53
27
5
0
0
Teaching Methods
65
18
2
0
0
Learning resources
68
17
0
0
0

B.Sc. Nursing 4th year (8th Sem)

Topics
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Overall content of syllabus
54
27
2
0
0
Relevance of Curriculum
64
19
0
0
0
Subject distribution in curriculum
51
30
2
0
0
Teaching Methods
65
18
0
0
0
Learning resources
70
13
0
0
0

M.Sc. Nursing 2nd year (2024 admission)

Topics
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Overall content of syllabus
11
6
2
0
0
Relevance of Curriculum
15
4
0
0
0
Subject distribution in curriculum
12
5
2
0
0
Teaching Methods
17
2
0
0
0
Learning resources
18
1
0
0
0

M.Sc. Nursing 2nd year (2023 admission)

Topics
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Overall content of syllabus
8
1
0
0
0
Relevance of Curriculum
7
1
1
0
0
Subject distribution in curriculum
6
3
0
0
0
Teaching Methods
9
0
0
0
0
Learning resources
7
2
0
0
0

PBB.Sc. Nursing 2nd year (2024 admission)

Topics
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Overall content of syllabus
34
12
4
0
0
Relevance of Curriculum
45
5
0
0
0
Subject distribution in curriculum
33
14
3
0
0
Teaching Methods
47
3
0
0
0
Learning resources
44
6
0
0
0

PBB.Sc. Nursing 2nd year (2023 admission)

Topics
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Overall content of syllabus
33
12
3
0
0
Relevance of Curriculum
44
4
0
0
0
Subject distribution in curriculum
33
14
1
0
0
Teaching Methods
46
2
0
0
0
Learning resources
44
4
0
0
0

Findings

B.Sc. 2nd year

Overall content of syllabus:  65.4% Excellent; 26.9% Very Good; 7.7% Good
Relevance of curriculum:      66.7% Excellent; 33.3% Very Good
Subject distribution:              59.0% Excellent; 34.6% Very Good; 6.4% Good
Teaching methods:                78.2% Excellent; 19.2% Very Good; 2.6% Good
Learning resources:               76.9% Excellent; 21.8% Very Good; 1.3% Good

B.Sc. 3rd year

Overall content of syllabus:  72.1% Excellent; 26.2% Very Good; 1.6% Good
Relevance of curriculum:      82.0% Excellent; 18.0% Very Good
Subject distribution:              63.9% Excellent; 32.8% Very Good; 3.3% Good
Teaching methods:                78.7% Excellent; 19.7% Very Good; 1.6% Good
Learning resources:               83.6% Excellent; 16.4% Very Good

B.Sc. 4th year (7th Sem)

Overall content of syllabus:  67.1% Excellent; 29.4% Very Good; 3.5% Good
Relevance of curriculum:      82.4% Excellent; 17.6% Very Good
Subject distribution:              62.4% Excellent; 31.8% Very Good; 5.8% Good
Teaching methods:                76.5% Excellent; 21.2% Very Good; 2.4% Good
Learning resources:               80.0% Excellent; 20.0% Very Good

B.Sc. 4th year (8th Sem)

Overall content of syllabus:  65.1% Excellent; 32.5% Very Good; 2.4% Good
Relevance of curriculum:      77.1% Excellent; 22.9% Very Good
Subject distribution:              61.4% Excellent; 36.1% Very Good; 2.4% Good
Teaching methods:                78.3% Excellent; 21.7% Very Good
Learning resources:               84.3% Excellent; 15.7% Very Good

M.Sc. 2nd year (2024 admission)

Overall content of syllabus:  57.9% Excellent; 31.6% Very Good; 10.5% Good
Relevance of curriculum:      78.9% Excellent; 21.1% Very Good
Subject distribution:              63.2% Excellent; 26.3% Very Good; 10.5% Good
Teaching methods:                89.5% Excellent; 10.5% Very Good
Learning resources:               94.7% Excellent; 5.3% Very Good

M.Sc. 2nd year (2023 admission)

Overall content of syllabus:  88.9% Excellent; 11.1% Very Good
Relevance of curriculum:      77.8% Excellent; 11.1% Very Good; 11.1% Good
Subject distribution:              66.7% Excellent; 33.3% Very Good
Teaching methods:              100.0% Excellent
Learning resources:               77.8% Excellent; 22.2% Very Good

PBB.Sc. 2nd year (2024 admission)

Overall content of syllabus:  68.0% Excellent; 24.0% Very Good; 8.0% Good
Relevance of curriculum:      90.0% Excellent; 10.0% Very Good
Subject distribution:              66.0% Excellent; 28.0% Very Good; 6.0% Good
Teaching methods:                94.0% Excellent; 6.0% Very Good
Learning resources:               88.0% Excellent; 12.0% Very Good

PBB.Sc. 2nd year (2023 admission)

Overall content of syllabus:  68.8% Excellent; 25.0% Very Good; 6.2% Good
Relevance of curriculum:      91.7% Excellent; 8.3% Very Good
Subject distribution:              68.8% Excellent; 29.2% Very Good; 2.0% Good
Teaching methods:                95.8% Excellent; 4.2% Very Good
Learning resources:               91.7% Excellent; 8.3% Very Good

The B.Sc. Nursing program shows the largest student cohorts and generally high satisfaction levels, particularly in teaching methods

B.Sc. Nursing 2nd Year
  • Strong “Excellent” ratings across all topics, especially Teaching Methods (61) and Learning Resources (60).
  • Relevance of Curriculum also scored high (52 “Excellent”).
  • Minimal “Good” ratings, no “Fair” or “Poor”.
B.Sc. Nursing 3rd Year
  • Slightly lower “Excellent” ratings compared to 2nd year.
  • Relevance of Curriculum and Learning Resources still performed well.
  • Subject Distribution and Teaching Methods saw a small rise in “Very Good” ratings.
B.Sc. Nursing 4th Year (7th Sem)
  • High satisfaction overall.
  • Relevance of Curriculum and Learning Resources had the most “Excellent” ratings (70 and 68).
  • Slight increase in “Good” ratings for Subject Distribution and Teaching Methods.
B.Sc. Nursing 4th Year (8th Sem)
  • Consistently strong feedback.
  • Teaching Methods and Learning Resources peaked with 65 and 70 “Excellent” ratings.
  • Very few “Good” ratings, no negative feedback.
PBB.Sc. Nursing 2nd Year (2024 admission)
  • Teaching Methods and Relevance of Curriculum received the highest “Excellent” ratings (47 and 45 respectively).
  • Learning Resources and Subject Distribution also scored well, with no ratings below “Good”.
  • Overall Content of Syllabus had slightly more “Very Good” and “Good” responses than other topics.
PBB.Sc. Nursing 2nd Year (2023 admission)
  • Very similar to 2024 batch with slightly fewer “Excellent” ratings.
  • Teaching Methods and Learning Resources remained strong.
  • Slight dip in “Good” ratings for Subject Distribution and Overall Content.

The M. Sc. cohorts are smaller, leading to more concentrated data.

M.Sc. Nursing 2nd Year (2024 admission)
  • Moderate “Excellent” ratings across all topics.
  • Learning Resources stood out with 18 “Excellent”.
  • Slight increase in “Good” ratings for Teaching Methods and Overall Content.
M.Sc. Nursing 2nd Year (2023 admission)
  • Noticeably lower ratings overall.
  • Most topics had fewer than 10 “Excellent” responses.
  • Teaching Methods and Learning Resources were relatively better but still below other batches.
Overall Trends:
  • Teaching Methods and Learning Resources consistently received the highest ratings across all batches.
  • Relevance of Curriculum is widely appreciated, especially in undergraduate programs.
  • Sc. Nursing 2023 batch shows the lowest satisfaction, indicating potential issues.
  • No batch reported “Fair” or “Poor” ratings, suggesting general satisfaction.

Suggestion from the students:

Some of the students have suggested subject distribution to be optimized or some innovative ideas to be adopted within the curriculum to manage the subject load.

B. Teachers’ Feedback
Topics
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevance of Curriculum
15
6
2
0
0
Clarity in learning objectives
20
3
0
0
0
Syllabus structure
18
5
0
0
0
Learning exposure
19
4
0
0
0
Teaching-Learning Resources
22
1
0
0
0
Applicability in profession
17
6
0
0
0
Support for diverse learners
16
5
2
0
0

Findings

Relevance of Curriculum:         65.2% Excellent; 26.1% Very Good; 8.7% Good
Clarity in Learning Objectives: 87.0% Excellent; 13.0% Very Good
Syllabus Structure:                    78.3% Excellent; 21.7% Very Good
Learning Exposure:                   82.6% Excellent; 17.4% Very Good
Teaching-learning Resources:   95.7% Excellent; 4.3% Very Good
Applicability in Profession:      73.9% Excellent; 26.1 % Very Good
Support for diverse learners:     69.6% Excellent; 21.7% Very Good; 8.7% Good

The feedback is exceptionally positive. There are zero ratings for “Fair” or “Poor” across any category. This suggests a high degree of faculty alignment with the institution’s direction and satisfaction with the resources provided to them.

Top Performing Areas
  • Teaching-learning Resources (95.7%):

This is the highest-rated parameter by the faculty. It indicates that teachers feel they have ample access to libraries, labs, and digital materials to support their instruction.

  • Clarity in Learning Objectives (87.0%):

Teachers are extremely confident in the  learning objectives to be robust and effective.

C. Alumni Feedback
Topics
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Overall content of syllabus
38
14
4
0
0
Relevance of Curriculum
51
5
0
0
0
Subject distribution in curriculum
35
18
3
0
0
Practical skill development
47
6
3
0
0
Learning Resources
50
6
0
0
0
Placement and internships
44
6
6
0
0
Support for diverse learners
38
15
3
0
0
Assessment methods
43
12
1
0
0

Findings

Overall content of syllabus:            67.9% Excellent; 25.0% Very Good; 7.1% Good
Relevance of curriculum:                91.1% Excellent; 8.9% Very Good
Subject distribution in curriculum: 62.5% Excellent; 32.1% Very Good; 5.4% Good
Practical skill development:            83.9% Excellent; 10.7% Very Good; 5.4% Good
Learning resources:                         89.3% Excellent; 10.7% Very Good
Placement and internships:              78.6% Excellent; 10.7% Very Good; 10.7% Good
Support for diverse learners:            67.9% Excellent; 26.8% Very Good; 5.4% Good
Assessment methods:                       76.8% Excellent; 21.4% Very Good; 1.8% Good

  • Relevance of Curriculum and Learning Resources are standout strengths.
  • Placement and internships show the most “Good” ratings, suggesting variability in student experiences.
  • Support for diverse learners and Subject distribution have slightly more mixed feedback, indicating areas for refinement.
  • No “Fair” or “Poor” ratings across any topic — a strong indicator of overall satisfaction.

Suggestion from the alumni:

Alumni’s feedback responses shows that they have suggested the clinical internships provided should be more individual need focused, for the students getting more personalized training based on there are of interest.

D. Employers’ Feedback
Topics
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevance of Curriculum
4
3
0
0
0
Work readiness and core skills
5
1
1
0
0
Practical exposure of students
3
3
1
0
0
Competency assessment
7
0
0
0
0
Communication skills
4
3
0
0
0
Technical skills
4
2
1
0
0
Teamwork and collaboration
5
2
0
0
0
Professionalism
3
0
4
0
0
Problem solving ability
3
3
1
0
0
Time management
3
2
2
0
0
Leadership potential
3
2
2
0
0

Findings

Relevance of curriculum:           57.1% Excellent; 42.9% Very Good
Work readiness and core skills:  71.4% Excellent; 14.3% Very Good; 14.3% Good
Practical exposure of students:   42.9% Excellent; 42.9% Very Good; 14.3% Good
Competency assessment:          100.0% Excellent
Communication skills:                57.1% Excellent; 42.9% Very Good
Technical skills:                          57.1% Excellent; 28.6% Very Good; 14.3% Good
Teamwork and collaboration:     71.4% Excellent; 28.6% Very Good
Professionalism:                         42.9% Excellent; 57.1% Very Good
Problem solving ability:             42.9% Excellent; 42.9% Very Good; 14.2% Good
Time management:                     42.9% Excellent; 28.6% Very Good; 28.6% Good
Leadership potential:                  42.9% Excellent; 28.6% Very Good; 28.6% Good

This feedback records respondent ratings across eleven topics using a five-point scale from Excellent to Poor. Feedbacks cluster heavily toward the top end. Competency assessment received unanimous highest Excellent response while Technical skills, Professionalism, and Relevance of Curriculum also show strong Excellent ratings. Areas such as Communication skills, Problem solving ability, and Practical exposure of students display more spread across Excellent, Very Good, and Good, indicating mixed perceptions. No topic received any Poor or Fair ratings.

The high Excellent and Very Good rating suggests employers mostly identify the program curriculum to be effective and relevant. High Excellent ratings for Competency assessment, Communication, Technical skills, and Professionalism suggest robust evaluation mechanisms and a culture supporting technical standards and workplace conduct.

Responses on Leadership potential and Time management indicate potential that is being realized unevenly. These are development areas rather than failures. Absence of Poor ratings implies no critical failures.

Suggestion from the employers:

The employers have suggested for students’ exposure to case studies for them to enhance their problem-solving ability and analytical thinking.

E. Professionals’ Feedbackk
Topics
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevance of Curriculum
4
1
0
0
0
Work readiness and core skills
4
1
0
0
0
Practical exposure of students
3
2
0
0
0
Soft skills and professionalism
3
1
1
0
0
Aptitude for continuing education
2
2
1
0
0

Findings

Relevance of curriculum:                80.0% Excellent; 20.0% Very Good
Work readiness and core skills:       80.0% Excellent; 20.0% Very Good
Practical exposure of students:        60.0% Excellent; 40.0% Very Good
Soft skills and professionalism:       60.0% Excellent; 20.0% Very Good; 20.0% Good
Aptitude for continuing education:  40.0% Excellent; 40.0% Very Good; 20.0% Good

Relevance of curriculum along with Work readiness and core skills received most positive responses. The professionals also find students practical exposure to be consistent and relevant. However, the responses of soft skills and professionalism and continuing education topics are unevenly distributed across the rating scale. Although there are no negative responses, the topics with less ‘excellent’ and ‘very good’ rating need some improvement.

Suggestion from the professionals:

The professionals suggested to encourage students for pursuing higher education.